article

Discovered Labs vs. Growthx: Which Solution Best Solves the AI Share of Voice Crisis?

Discovered Labs vs. Growthx: Compare solutions for the AI Share of Voice crisis to gain competitive insights and inform your strategy. Uncover your AI citation gaps and choose the right partner to ensure your brand is cited by AI, driving qualified pipeline and competitive wins.

Liam Dunne
Liam Dunne
Growth marketer and B2B demand specialist with expertise in AI search optimisation - I've worked with 50+ firms, scaled some to 8-figure ARR, and managed $400k+/mo budgets.
January 19, 2026
16 mins

Updated January 19, 2026

TL;DR: Both Discovered Labs and Growthx offer managed content services, but they solve different problems. Growthx delivers AI-powered content at scale with expert-led strategy, ideal for teams needing high-volume production across multiple formats. Discovered Labs specializes exclusively in Answer Engine Optimization using the proprietary CITABLE framework, tracking competitive AI Share of Voice across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews while producing 20+ citation-optimized articles monthly. If your challenge is "competitors dominate AI recommendations while we're invisible," Discovered Labs targets that specific gap. If your challenge is "we need content velocity across channels," Growthx provides broader coverage. AI-referred traffic converts at 23x higher rates than traditional organic search, making the choice between generalist content production and specialized AEO execution a critical pipeline decision.

Your prospect just asked ChatGPT "What's the best healthcare tech platform for mid-market hospitals?" Three competitors appeared in the answer with specific reasons why they're recommended. Your company, despite ranking page one in Google for that exact query, wasn't mentioned.

You lost a $180,000 deal before your sales team knew the prospect existed.

This scenario repeats daily for B2B marketing leaders watching traditional SEO metrics climb while pipeline stagnates. Approximately 60% of Google queries now end without clicks as AI-generated answers fulfill intent directly on the search results page. The question isn't whether to adapt, it's which partner can fix your AI invisibility fastest.

For marketing leaders evaluating Discovered Labs versus Growthx, the decision hinges on whether you need specialized AEO execution with competitive intelligence or AI-powered content production at scale. This guide compares both to help you decide which fits your pipeline growth goals.

Traditional competitive analysis tracked keyword rankings, backlink profiles, and domain authority. You measured success by position in search results, assuming higher rankings drove more conversions. That model breaks when over 1.5 billion users monthly interact with Google AI Overviews alone, receiving synthesized answers instead of blue links.

The shift from "10 blue links" to a single AI-generated response fundamentally changes competitive dynamics. In traditional SEO, ranking positions 1-3 captured the majority of clicks. In AI search, only brands cited within the answer exist to buyers. According to HubSpot's 2025 State of Sales, 74% of sales professionals report AI makes it easier for buyers to research products, shifting the seller's role from pitching to confidence building.

Your traditional SEO agency reports "great keyword rankings" while qualified pipeline declines because they're optimizing for the wrong metric. Traditional SEO measures rankings on a page. AI visibility measures whether you appear in the answer itself. This creates what we call the Execution Gap: knowing competitors dominate ChatGPT recommendations but lacking the specialized expertise, daily production capacity, or proven framework to close the gap.

Share of Voice in AI search extends the classic idea to AI-generated answers. For a defined set of prompts and topics, it captures the proportion of answer real estate, citations, and recommendations that feature your brand relative to competitors. Unlike traditional rank tracking which only shows position, AI Share of Voice looks at the full picture: who's getting seen, cited, and remembered by prospects using AI assistants.

The market shift is measurable. Gartner predicts search volume may drop 25% due to zero-click answers, but the traffic that remains has fundamentally different intent and conversion characteristics. Tracking your position in a list of 10 blue links becomes irrelevant when users never see that list.

Discovered Labs vs. Growthx: Core philosophy and approach

Both companies position themselves as managed services handling content production, but they solve different problems with distinct methodologies.

Growthx: The AI-powered content-at-scale approach

Growthx builds content systems designed for compounding growth, optimizing for SEO, AEO, GEO, and AI assistants through expert-guided AI workflows. Their model combines forward-deployed experts with tailored AI workflows to efficiently generate quality content at scale.

A Growthx subscription gives you access to their full editorial engine: research, writing, distribution, and analytics. They offer a suite including editorial content, programmatic SEO, case studies, content refresh, and AEO services. The company has raised $29.1M in funding, indicating they serve well-funded clients requiring enterprise-grade content operations.

The strength of Growthx lies in content velocity across multiple formats. They define quality standards and brand voice collaboratively, then build custom AI workflows with human oversight to scale consistently. Their forward-deployed expert network shapes strategy, builds agentic AI workflows, and ensures quality at scale.

Limitation: Growthx doesn't offer explicit AI Share of Voice tracking as a core deliverable. Their focus is content production and distribution rather than competitive intelligence dashboards showing where you rank in ChatGPT versus competitors. Teams choosing Growthx must handle their own AI visibility measurement or layer in separate monitoring tools.

Discovered Labs: The execution-first visibility engine

Discovered Labs specializes exclusively in organic search (SEO) and Answer Engine Optimization (AEO), combining proprietary tracking technology with the CITABLE framework to engineer B2B brands into AI recommendation layers. We track and we execute.

Using internal technology we've built, we audit where you appear across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews, then produce 20+ articles monthly structured specifically for LLM retrieval. Our cadence is unusual: we ship daily for clients, prioritize third-party validation as much as owned content, and continuously test content formats directly against AI systems.

We specialize in B2B companies across SaaS, fintech, healthcare, and professional services. Our strategies work best for companies with complex products where AI search users need expert guidance and recommendations. The proprietary CITABLE framework ensures content is verifiable and compliant, critical for regulated industries.

Key differentiator: We were built by an AI researcher and a demand generation marketer who helped B2B companies scale to $20M+ ARR. This combination means we understand how LLMs decide what to cite (technical depth) and how to translate that into pipeline impact (growth expertise). Recently, we helped a B2B SaaS company take their AI-referred trials from 550 to 2,300 in 4 weeks by shipping 66 CITABLE-optimized articles.

Feature comparison: Tracking visibility vs. influencing citations

Capability Discovered Labs Growthx
AI visibility tracking Proprietary audit across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Copilot with competitive benchmarking Not specified as core deliverable; focus on content production
Content production volume 20+ articles/month minimum (retainers scale to 2-3 pieces daily for larger clients) Custom volume based on subscription tier; AI workflows enable high velocity
AEO methodology CITABLE framework (7-component system designed for LLM retrieval) General AEO services within broader content suite
Contract terms Month-to-month, no long-term commitment Custom pricing; likely annual or quarterly commitments given enterprise positioning
Starting price point €5,495/month (transparent pricing) Custom/enterprise pricing (not publicly listed)
Healthcare/B2B compliance focus Explicit third-party validation and verifiable sourcing for regulated industries General content quality standards with expert oversight

AI visibility auditing and gap analysis

Knowing you're losing isn't the same as knowing how to win. Discovered Labs delivers comprehensive AI Search Visibility Audits testing 75-100 buyer-intent queries to identify where competitors are cited while your brand remains invisible.

The audit reveals your Share of Voice percentage across AI platforms, showing the proportion of high-intent queries where you appear versus total relevant queries. This creates baseline metrics you can track weekly to measure progress. One B2B SaaS company came to us with strong Google rankings but declining pipeline. The audit revealed competitors appeared in 65% of ChatGPT recommendations while their brand was cited in 0% of tested queries.

We test bottom-of-funnel buyer queries like "best [category] for [specific use case]" across all major platforms. The audit identifies 8-10 "quick win" queries where targeted content can break through immediately, plus strategic gaps requiring longer-term authority building. Discovered Labs' AEO Sprint delivers this audit in 14 days along with 10 optimized articles, answer modeling, schema implementation, and a 30-day action plan.

Growthx doesn't position AI visibility auditing as a standalone deliverable. Their strength lies in executing the content strategy once you've identified what to create, not in diagnosing competitive gaps through systematic query testing.

Content production and the CITABLE framework

Data about the gap is useless without capacity to close it. This is where execution models diverge sharply.

Discovered Labs operationalizes the CITABLE framework for every piece of content produced. The seven-component methodology structures content specifically for how LLMs decide what to cite:

  1. Clear entity and structure: Open with 2-3 sentence BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front) explicitly identifying who you are and what you do
  2. Intent architecture: Answer the main question plus adjacent questions users ask next
  3. Third-party validation: Include reviews, user-generated content, community mentions, news citations
  4. Answer grounding: Provide verifiable facts with sources, not vague claims
  5. Block-structured for RAG: Use 200-400 word sections, tables, FAQs, ordered lists AI retrieval systems parse easily
  6. Latest and consistent: Include timestamps and ensure facts are unified across your site, G2, Wikipedia, other sources
  7. Entity graph and schema: Make explicit relationships clear (e.g., "Our platform integrates with Salesforce and HubSpot")

We produce 20-60+ articles monthly (daily cadence, not weekly) while handling technical implementation plus Reddit marketing to build third-party validation. Each retainer starts at minimum 20 pieces per month. This isn't generic blog content but researched, structured pieces designed as direct answers to buyer questions.

Growthx might tell you what to write through their expert-led strategy. Discovered Labs writes it using a framework purpose-built for AI citation. The difference matters when your marketing team is already at capacity and lacks specialized AEO expertise.

Growthx excels at producing diverse content formats at scale through AI workflows, making them ideal for teams needing programmatic SEO, case studies, editorial content, and content refresh across multiple channels. Discovered Labs focuses exclusively on the content that influences AI citations and competitive Share of Voice.

Healthcare and B2B compliance capabilities

For marketing leaders in regulated industries, content accuracy isn't optional. AI systems citing your brand with incorrect claims creates compliance liability and erodes trust.

The "T" in CITABLE stands for Third-party validation, which AI models trust more than your own website. We ensure content is defensible, verifiable, and trustworthy by citing peer-reviewed studies, including structured data for credentials, referencing authoritative third-party sources, and building community validation through Reddit, reviews, and G2.

Why this reduces AI hallucination risk: By providing pre-verified, properly attributed facts in block-structured formats, you reduce the likelihood AI will synthesize incorrect information when citing your brand. ChatGPT heavily biases towards Reddit for web searches and answer grounding. For B2B marketers, if your brand isn't discussed positively on Reddit, AI systems have no community validation to reference.

Answer grounding requires verifiable facts with sources, not vague claims. Latest and consistent means timestamps plus unified facts across your site, G2, Wikipedia, and other sources. This level of consistency and verification is built into every Discovered Labs deliverable.

Growthx provides general content quality standards with expert oversight but doesn't explicitly position third-party validation and healthcare compliance as differentiating capabilities. Teams in fintech, healthcare tech, or other regulated spaces should evaluate whether their chosen partner understands these constraints from day one.

Reddit marketing and third-party authority building

AI models trust external validation more than owned content. Discovered Labs offers dedicated Reddit marketing services using aged, high-karma account infrastructure to rank posts in target subreddits and shape narratives that AI systems reference.

This creates the community validation ChatGPT looks for when deciding whether to cite your brand. One client gets hundreds of thousands of impressions and hundreds of engagements on Reddit monthly, building authority that translates directly into more frequent AI citations.

Growthx's content distribution includes various channels but doesn't specify dedicated Reddit infrastructure or aged account management as a core service offering.

Implementation: How execution models differ in practice

The Execution Gap reveals itself most clearly during implementation. Both services promise content, but what actually happens in week one?

Discovered Labs implementation workflow

Week 1-2:

  • AI Search Visibility Audit delivered showing current citation gaps, competitive benchmarking across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews
  • Strategic roadmap presentation with specific query priorities
  • Daily content production begins using CITABLE framework
  • Reddit marketing strategy initiated for third-party validation

Week 3-4:

  • Initial AI citation signals appear (8-15% of tested buyer-intent queries)
  • Weekly citation tracking reports show which content drives results
  • First measurable increases in AI-referred website traffic

Month 2-3:

  • Citation rate grows to 22-35% of priority queries
  • Competitive Share of Voice gap narrows measurably
  • 30-60 new MQLs monthly attributable to AI visibility
  • Conversion rate advantage becomes clear (AI traffic converts 23x better than traditional organic search)

Month 4+:

  • Citation rate reaches 40-50% of target queries
  • AI-referred MQLs scale to 100-200+ monthly
  • Projected pipeline impact: $150K-$300K based on average deal size

One client went from 500 AI-referred trials to 3,500+ in seven weeks using this exact workflow.

Growthx implementation workflow

Growthx's forward-deployed experts collaborate with your team to define quality standards and brand voice, then build custom AI workflows for scaled production. Implementation focuses on establishing the content system rather than immediate AI citation metrics.

Their model works well for teams that can internally handle AI visibility measurement while outsourcing content velocity. If you have marketing operations capacity to track competitive Share of Voice using separate tools, Growthx's AI-powered production engine complements that infrastructure.

The distinction: Discovered Labs provides both the measurement dashboard and the execution engine in one integrated service. Growthx provides the execution engine, expecting you to bring (or build) the measurement layer separately.

Pricing models and contract flexibility

Budget and risk tolerance significantly influence partner selection.

Discovered Labs pricing structure

Pricing starts at €5,495 per month with month-to-month terms and no long-term commitment. The starting package includes:

  • Minimum 20 SEO and AEO optimized articles monthly
  • Comprehensive visibility tracking across all major AI platforms
  • Competitor monitoring and Share of Voice reporting
  • Monthly performance reviews
  • Technical SEO and AEO audits
  • Backlink building
  • Reddit marketing
  • Programmatic content capability
  • Landing pages
  • Original studies

All retainer contracts are monthly with no long-term commitment, giving you complete flexibility to scale up, down, or cancel with 30-day notice. This pricing model reflects confidence that results will justify continued investment without contractual lock-in.

For teams wanting to test the methodology before committing to ongoing retainers, Discovered Labs offers an AEO Sprint at €4,995 as a one-time project. This 14-day engagement delivers 10 optimized articles, complete AI visibility audit, schema structure, and 30-day action plan.

Growthx pricing structure

Growthx uses custom/enterprise pricing not publicly listed on their website. Given their $29.1M in venture funding and forward-deployed expert model, pricing likely reflects enterprise positioning with annual or quarterly commitments.

Teams evaluating Growthx should expect discovery calls to determine scope and pricing based on content volume needs across multiple formats and channels.

ROI calculation for marketing leaders

The pricing decision ultimately hinges on pipeline impact, not monthly fees. AI-referred traffic converts dramatically better than traditional search, making the cost-per-qualified-lead calculation favorable even at higher price points.

Using the verified 23x conversion rate advantage from Ahrefs data:

Traditional organic search scenario:

  • 1,000 monthly visitors × 2% conversion = 20 MQLs
  • 20 MQLs × 25% SQL rate = 5 SQLs
  • 5 SQLs × 20% close rate = 1 deal
  • Average deal size $80,000 = $80,000 monthly pipeline

AI-referred traffic scenario:

  • 200 monthly visitors (lower volume) × 46% conversion rate (23x higher) = 92 MQLs
  • 92 MQLs × 35% SQL rate (better quality) = 32 SQLs
  • 32 SQLs × 20% close rate = 6.4 deals
  • Average deal size $80,000 = $512,000 monthly pipeline

This 6.4x pipeline multiplier justifies premium pricing for the partner who can actually deliver AI visibility improvements. The question becomes which model delivers those results fastest for your specific situation.

Problem and impact: The AI citation invisibility crisis

Your competitors appear in ChatGPT recommendations with specific reasons why they're good fits. You're completely invisible, losing deals before sales conversations start.

This invisibility directly impacts pipeline and brand reputation. When prospects research vendors using AI assistants and never see your brand, you don't exist in their consideration set. Traditional SEO success (ranking page one for target keywords) no longer translates to visibility in the buying journey that matters.

Marketing leaders face eroding credibility with executive teams when they can't confidently answer "What's our AI search strategy?" Reporting strong keyword rankings while pipeline declines creates a trust gap with CEOs and boards who read the same industry reports predicting 25% search volume drops.

Quick fix: Initial AI visibility audit

The immediate action is understanding where you stand. Discovered Labs' AI Visibility Audit tests your current citation rate across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews, showing exactly which competitors dominate which queries.

This audit typically reveals:

  • 8-10 "quick win" queries where targeted content can achieve citations within 2-4 weeks
  • Strategic authority gaps requiring longer-term third-party validation building
  • Inconsistencies in brand information across platforms that confuse AI systems
  • Specific reasons competitors get cited (format, structure, verification) you can replicate

Armed with this data, you can prioritize the highest-impact queries and allocate resources accordingly.

Long-term approach: Strategic AEO implementation

Quick wins stabilize pipeline in the short term. Category leadership requires sustained execution using a proven methodology.

The CITABLE framework provides that systematic approach. By structuring every content piece for LLM retrieval from day one, you build compounding citation advantages over competitors still optimizing for traditional SEO signals.

Long-term success requires:

  • Daily content production targeting specific buyer queries (not weekly or monthly publishing)
  • Continuous third-party validation building through Reddit, reviews, community engagement
  • Weekly tracking to identify what's working and double down
  • Technical optimization (schema, entity clarity, structured data)
  • Consistent brand information across all platforms AI systems reference

This is why the service model matters. DIY tools show you the problem but leave execution to your already-stretched team. Managed services handle the heavy lifting, but only specialized AEO agencies focus exclusively on the metrics that matter (citation rate, Share of Voice, AI-referred pipeline).

Preventive measures: Continuous competitive monitoring

AI platforms update retrieval algorithms constantly. What gets cited today may not get cited next month if competitors adapt faster.

Discovered Labs provides weekly citation tracking reports showing trending changes in competitive Share of Voice. When a competitor's citation rate suddenly increases, you see it immediately and can investigate what changed in their content strategy, third-party presence, or technical implementation.

This continuous monitoring prevents the scenario where you fix visibility once, then slowly become invisible again as the market and algorithms evolve. Think of it as ongoing competitive intelligence focused specifically on the AI layer rather than traditional search rankings.

How Discovered Labs helps: From audit to execution

We combine proprietary tracking technology with managed execution services to solve both sides of the equation: measurement and results.

AI Visibility Reports: Weekly reports show your citation rate across platforms, competitive positioning versus top 3-5 competitors, trending queries where you're gaining or losing ground, and specific content pieces driving citations. This creates clear accountability and progress tracking you can present to executive stakeholders.

Competitive Intelligence: We build a knowledge graph of all content across hundreds of thousands of clicks monthly to understand what clusters, topics, formats, titles, and slugs perform best. This data advantage comes from working with multiple B2B clients simultaneously, learning what works across industries and applying those insights to your specific market.

Implementation Steps: Our proactive AEO strategy follows a clear workflow: audit current state, identify high-priority gaps, produce CITABLE-optimized content daily, build third-party validation, track citation improvements weekly, optimize based on what drives results, and scale successful formats. We helped one B2B SaaS company improve ChatGPT referrals by 29% and close 5 new paying customers in month one using this exact process.

For a deeper look at how we compare to other monitoring platforms, see our analysis of Discovered Labs vs Otterly and Discovered Labs vs Profound.

The verdict: When to choose Discovered Labs over Growthx

Both companies deliver managed content services, but they solve different problems for different teams.

Choose Growthx if:

You need high-volume content across multiple formats and channels. Growthx's AI-powered workflows excel at producing editorial content, programmatic SEO, case studies, and content refresh at scale. Their forward-deployed expert model provides strategic oversight while leveraging AI for velocity.

You have internal capacity to handle AI visibility measurement. If your marketing operations team can track competitive Share of Voice using separate tools (or you're willing to add that software layer), Growthx's execution engine complements that infrastructure.

Your primary challenge is content production bandwidth. Teams that know what to create but lack resources to produce it benefit from Growthx's expert-guided AI workflows that scale quality consistently.

You value diverse content formats beyond AEO. If your strategy requires blog posts, whitepapers, case studies, programmatic pages, and other formats alongside AI optimization, Growthx provides broader coverage.

Choose Discovered Labs if:

Competitors dominate ChatGPT recommendations while you're invisible. If prospects ask AI for vendor recommendations and you're not cited, you need specialized AEO execution focused exclusively on that gap. We've helped clients go from 0% citation rate to 40-50% within 90 days.

You lack internal AEO expertise and want a turnkey solution. Discovered Labs combines tracking technology with CITABLE framework execution in one integrated service. You don't need to hire an AEO specialist or learn the technical nuances yourself.

You're in healthcare, fintech, or other regulated industries. The CITABLE framework's focus on third-party validation, verifiable sourcing, and consistency across platforms directly addresses compliance requirements. Content that AI cites incorrectly creates liability you can't afford.

You need flexible terms without long-term commitment. Month-to-month contracts let you test results before committing to extended partnerships. If citation rate doesn't improve and pipeline doesn't grow within 90 days, you can walk away.

You want competitive intelligence built into execution. Weekly Share of Voice tracking shows exactly where you stand versus competitors, which queries you're winning, and where you need to double down. This competitive layer informs strategy rather than requiring separate analysis.

Pipeline impact matters more than content volume. AI-referred traffic converts 23x better than traditional search. If your goal is qualified MQLs that close, not just traffic or content output, specialization in AEO delivers measurable ROI faster.

For marketing leaders like Maria running lean teams at B2B SaaS, fintech, or healthcare tech companies ($2M-$50M ARR), the specialized AEO focus typically outweighs the broader content coverage. You can supplement Discovered Labs' AI visibility execution with internal content for other channels. It's harder to supplement a generalist content agency with the specialized AEO expertise and tracking infrastructure you need to win in AI search.

Take action: Request your AI visibility audit

The first step is understanding where you currently stand in AI recommendations versus competitors.

Request a free AI Visibility Audit from Discovered Labs to see your citation rate across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews. We'll test 50-75 buyer-intent queries relevant to your category and show you exactly which competitors are cited and why.

The audit reveals your baseline Share of Voice, identifies quick-win opportunities, and quantifies the pipeline opportunity cost of AI invisibility. Armed with that data, you can make an informed decision about which partner and approach fits your specific situation.

If your challenge is "we need content at scale across channels," explore Growthx's AI-powered workflows. If your challenge is "competitors dominate AI recommendations and we're losing deals," book a strategy call with Discovered Labs to discuss a 90-day roadmap for improving citation rate and capturing AI-referred pipeline.

The AI Share of Voice crisis is solvable with the right execution partner. The question is whether you'll act now while the competitive landscape is still fluid, or wait until your invisibility becomes an insurmountable disadvantage.


Frequently asked questions

How long does it take to see initial AI citations after starting with either service?
Discovered Labs clients typically see initial citations in 8-15% of tested queries within 3-4 weeks, growing to 40-50% by month three with daily content production using the CITABLE framework.

Can I track AI Share of Voice improvements without hiring an agency?
You can manually test queries across ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity, but systematic tracking requires testing hundreds of query variations weekly across platforms, which most lean teams lack bandwidth to execute consistently.

What's the minimum content volume needed to move AI citation rate?
Discovered Labs starts at 20 articles monthly because compounding citation advantages require sustained visibility across multiple buyer-intent queries; competitors with higher content velocity will outpace slower publishers.

Do either service guarantee specific citation rates or rankings?
No reputable AEO partner guarantees rankings because AI platforms update retrieval algorithms constantly; focus on partners who commit to measurable progress tracking and flexible terms if results don't materialize.

How does Reddit marketing directly improve ChatGPT citations?
ChatGPT heavily biases towards Reddit for web searches and answer grounding, meaning positive brand discussions in relevant subreddits provide third-party validation that increases citation likelihood for related queries.


Key terms glossary

AI Share of Voice: The proportion of AI-generated answer real estate, citations, and recommendations featuring your brand relative to competitors for a defined set of buyer-intent queries across platforms like ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews.

CITABLE framework: Discovered Labs' proprietary seven-component methodology (Clear entity, Intent architecture, Third-party validation, Answer grounding, Block-structured, Latest, Entity graph) structuring content specifically for LLM retrieval and citation.

Execution Gap: The distance between knowing competitors dominate AI recommendations (data) and actually fixing AI invisibility (results) through specialized expertise, daily production capacity, and proven frameworks.

Answer Engine Optimization (AEO): The practice of structuring content, building authority, and optimizing technical elements specifically to increase citation likelihood in AI-generated answers across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and similar platforms.

Continue Reading

Discover more insights on AI search optimization

Jan 23, 2026

How Google AI Overviews works

Google AI Overviews does not use top-ranking organic results. Our analysis reveals a completely separate retrieval system that extracts individual passages, scores them for relevance & decides whether to cite them.

Read article
Jan 23, 2026

How Google AI Mode works

Google AI Mode is not simply a UI layer on top of traditional search. It is a completely different rendering pipeline. Google AI Mode runs 816 active experiments simultaneously, routes queries through five distinct backend services, and takes 6.5 seconds on average to generate a response.

Read article